Mikoko Pamoja Mangrove restoration in Gazi Bay

Project/Juridiction proponent

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Mikoko Pamoja Community OrganizationNDKenyaNGO/private non for profit

Project/Juridiction Partners

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
AVIVA PLCNDKenyaPrivate for profit
Earthwatch InstituteNDKenyaND
Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programmeNDKenyaND
Kenya Forest Service (KFS)NDKenyaPublic
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)NDKenyaResearch/academic institute
World Wildlife Fund#http://wwf.panda.org/#KenyaNGO/private non for profit

Project characteristics

  • ID-RECCO ID
    363
  • Project status 2022
    Ongoing
  • Project name
    Mikoko Pamoja Mangrove restoration in Gazi Bay
  • Secondary name
    Mikoko Pamoja; Mangroves Together Mangrove restoration in Gazi Bay
  • Country
    Kenya
  • Last IDRECCO update year
    2020
  • Size (in hectare)
    117
  • Start year
    ND
  • End year
    2033
  • Duration
    20
  • Project description
    A community-led project in Kenya will protect 107 ha of natural mangrove forest and 10 hectares of plantation as well as planting an additional 0.4 ha of forest annually, over a project time-scale of 20 years. Carbon benefits are conservatively estimated as 2500 tonnes CO2 per year, which is derived from a mix of avoided deforestation, prevented forest degradation and new planting. All projected profit from Mikoko Pamoja will be invested in local projects determined through community consultation.
  • Objective 1
    biodiversity conservation
  • Objective 2
    social development
  • Objective 3
    climate
  • Deforestation drivers
    energy wood, illegal logging, local livelihoods
  • Type of forest
    wetland
  • Project activity
    ARR|REDD
  • Project Type
    REDD
  • Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activity
    ecosystem restoration
  • Multiple locations?
    No
  • Jurisdiction level 1
    Province : Coast
  • Jurisdiction level 2
    District : Kwale

Carbon accounting

  • Crediting period
    2013-2032
  • Period to calculate annual carbon credits
  • Annual carbon credits
  • Total carbon credits
    49700
  • Leakage is expected?
    yes
  • Carbon pools included
    Above ground biomass | Below ground biomass
  • Gasses included
    CH4 | CO2
  • Reference period start year
    ND
  • Reference period end year
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1
    Plan vivo

Carbon certification

  • Carbon standard 1 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 1 Publication date
    41670
  • Carbon standard 1 Weblinks
    https://mer.markit.com/br-reg/public/project.jsp?project_id=103000000008881
  • Carbon standard 1 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2
    none
  • Carbon standard 2 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3
    none
  • Carbon standard 3 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Expiry date
    ND
  • Source of information
    http://www.planvivo.org/projects/registeredprojects/mikoko-pamoja-kenya/ ; http://theredddesk.org/countries/initiatives/mikoko-pamoja-mangrove-restoration-gazi-bay ; http://www.planvivo.org/wp-content/uploads/MP_press_release.pdf ; http://www.planvivo.org/wp-content/uploads/Mikoko-Pamoja-mangroves-TS-FINAL.pdf

Community level intervention

  • Any monetary benefits?
    Yes
  • Monetary benefit type
    Unclear
  • Monetary benefit detail
    Employment: Funds to create directly and indirectly over 50 jobs and promote community enterprises. Direct cash: All income from the sales of Plan Vivo Certificates from Mikoko Pamoja will be spent following the Community Benefit Consultation Process. Hence the details of payments to individual beneficiaries will depend in each case on the priorities determined by local people.
  • Provides employment?
    Yes
  • Are there non-cash benefits?
    Yes
  • Economic activities - type
    plantation forestry | tree planting
  • Is there tenure clarification?
    Yes
  • Is there environmental education?
    No
  • Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?
    Yes
  • Is there forest enhancement?
    Yes
  • Is there community infrastracture improvement?
    No
  • Is there other community benefits?
    Yes