Jurisdictional program of the State of Campeche in Mexico

Project/Juridiction proponent

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Comisión Nacional Forestal (National Forestry Commission)#http://www.conafor.gob.mx/portal/#MexicoPublic
Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales- Campeche (Secretary of Natural Resources and the Environment-Campeche)NDMexicoPublic
The Nature Conservancy (Alliance Mexico REDD+)#http://www.alianza-mredd.org/en/home/#MexicoNGO/private non for profit

Project/Juridiction Partners

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
International Union for Conservation of Nature(IUCN )NDMexicoInternational organization
PronaturaNDMexicoNGO/private non for profit

Project characteristics

  • ID-RECCO ID
    828
  • Project status 2022
    Legacy information for jurisdictional program - no longer updated
  • Project name
    Jurisdictional program of the State of Campeche in Mexico
  • Secondary name
  • Country
    Mexico
  • Last IDRECCO update year
    2020
  • Size (in hectare)
    5792400
  • Start year
    ND
  • End year
    ND
  • Duration
    ND
  • Project description
    10 : -Yucatan Peninsula Climate Fund / Fondo Climático de la Península de Yucatán A.C. -Yucatan Peninsula Framework Agreement on Sustainability (ASPY 2030) / Acuerdo de Sustentabilidad de la Peninsula Yucatan -Estrategia para la Conservación y el Uso Sustentable de la Biodiversidad en el Estado de Campeche Strategy for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in the State of Campeche (ECUSBIOCAM) / -Community Forest Development Project of the Southern States Chiapas, Oaxaca and Campeche (DECOFOS) / Proyecto de Desarrollo Comunitario Forestal de los Estados del sur Chiapas, Oaxaca y Campeche -Emissions Reduction Initiative Agreement between CONAFOR and the State Government (Convenio IRE CONAFOR-Gobierno del Estado) -State REDD+ Strategy of Campeche (EEREDD+) -State of Campeche Strategic Forestry Program / Programa Estratégico Forestal del Estado de Campeche -Alianza Mexico REDD+ -Payment for Environmental Services; Programa de Pagos de Servicios Ambientales PSA-CABSA -Proagro Productivo (initially started as ProCampo)
  • Objective 1
    ND
  • Objective 2
    ND
  • Objective 3
    ND
  • Deforestation drivers
    cattle grazing, fire, industrial agriculture or cattle ranching, local livelihoods, Transient agriculture
  • Type of forest
    ND
  • Project activity
    jurisdictional/landscape
  • Project Type
    Jurisdictional/landscape
  • Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activity
    NA
  • Multiple locations?
    No
  • Jurisdiction level 1
    State : Campeche
  • Jurisdiction level 2
    all

Carbon accounting

  • Crediting period
    ND
  • Period to calculate annual carbon credits
    ND
  • Annual carbon credits
    ND
  • Total carbon credits
    ND
  • Leakage is expected?
    ND
  • Carbon pools included
    ND
  • Gasses included
    ND
  • Reference period start year
    ND
  • Reference period end year
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1
    ND

Carbon certification

  • Carbon standard 1 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Expiry date
    ND
  • Source of information
    CIFOR and EII Global Survey on jurisdictional programs

Community level intervention

  • Any monetary benefits?
    ND
  • Monetary benefit type
    ND
  • Monetary benefit detail
    ND
  • Provides employment?
    ND
  • Are there non-cash benefits?
    Yes
  • Economic activities - type
    ND
  • Is there tenure clarification?
    Yes
  • Is there environmental education?
    ND
  • Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?
    Yes
  • Is there forest enhancement?
    Yes
  • Is there community infrastracture improvement?
    ND
  • Is there other community benefits?
    Yes