Manoa REDD+ Project

Project/Juridiction proponent

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Triângulo Pisos e Paineis Ltda.www.triangulo.com.br#http://www.triangulo.com.br#BrazilPrivate for profit
Biofilica Investimentos Ambientais S.A.#http://www.biofilica.com.br/web/index.php#BrazilPrivate for profit

Project/Juridiction Partners

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Hdom Consultoria AmbientalNDBrazilPrivate for profit
Casa da Floresta Assessoria AmbientalNDBrazilPrivate for profit
Ecoporé-Ação Ecológica GuaporéNDBrazilNGO/private non for profit
Florestal - Planejamento, Paisagismo e Consultoria LtdaNDBrazilPrivate for profit

Project characteristics

  • ID-RECCO ID
    819
  • Project status 2022
    Ongoing
  • Project name
    Manoa REDD+ Project
  • Secondary name
    Manoa REDD+ Project
  • Country
    Brazil
  • Last IDRECCO update year
    2020
  • Size (in hectare)
    74038
  • Start year
    ND
  • End year
    2042
  • Duration
    30
  • Project description
    Manoa REDD+ Project is a partnership between Biofílica and Grupo Triângulo, located at Manoa Farm, city of Cujubim, state of Rondônia, in an area of 74.038,7 hectares. The farm`s 73,000 hectares of forest demonstrates the pioneering in sustainable forest management, and are one of the few forest areas remaining in private area in the region, constantly threatened by invasions and timber theft.Manoa Project will carry on the following actions to reduce deforestation and consequently reduce emissions:forest protection and monitoring; scientific research, local socioeconomic and social empowerment.
  • Objective 1
    climate
  • Objective 2
    biodiversity conservation
  • Objective 3
    social development
  • Deforestation drivers
    cattle grazing, illegal logging, infrastructure, local livelihoods
  • Type of forest
    humid
  • Project activity
    REDD
  • Project Type
    REDD
  • Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activity
    NA
  • Multiple locations?
    No
  • Jurisdiction level 1
    State : Rondônia
  • Jurisdiction level 2
    Municipality : Cujubim, Itapoã do Oeste, and Porto Velho

Carbon accounting

  • Crediting period
    2013-2042
  • Period to calculate annual carbon credits
    2013-2042
  • Annual carbon credits
    248597.56666667
  • Total carbon credits
    7457927
  • Leakage is expected?
    yes
  • Carbon pools included
    Above ground biomass | Below ground biomass
  • Gasses included
    CO2
  • Reference period start year
    2000
  • Reference period end year
    2012
  • Carbon standard 1
    VCS

Carbon certification

  • Carbon standard 1 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 1 Publication date
    42980
  • Carbon standard 1 Weblinks
    https://registry.verra.org/mymodule/ProjectDoc/Project_ViewFile.asp?FileID=44361&IDKEY=nlksjoiuwqowrnoiuomnckjashoufifmln902309ksdflku098u61173819
  • Carbon standard 1 Expiry date
    44805
  • Carbon standard 2
    CCB
  • Carbon standard 2 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 2 Publication date
    42980
  • Carbon standard 2 Weblinks
    https://registry.verra.org/mymodule/ProjectDoc/Project_ViewFile.asp?FileID=44362&IDKEY=f097809fdslkjf09rndasfufd098asodfjlkduf09nm23mrn87n61175198
  • Carbon standard 2 Expiry date
    44805
  • Carbon standard 3
    FSC
  • Carbon standard 3 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 3 Publication date
    38716
  • Carbon standard 3 Weblinks
    https://info.fsc.org/details.php?id=a0240000005sV7PAAU&type=certificate
  • Carbon standard 3 Expiry date
    ND
  • Source of information
    Project PDD: https://registry.verra.org/app/projectDetail/VCS/1571 https://registry.verra.org/app/projectDetail/CCB/1571

Community level intervention

  • Any monetary benefits?
    Yes
  • Monetary benefit type
    Non-conditional
  • Monetary benefit detail
    The project provide income generation through employment
  • Provides employment?
    Yes
  • Are there non-cash benefits?
    Yes
  • Economic activities - type
    agriculture | agroforestry | tree planting
  • Is there tenure clarification?
    No
  • Is there environmental education?
    Yes
  • Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?
    Yes
  • Is there forest enhancement?
    Yes
  • Is there community infrastracture improvement?
    No
  • Is there other community benefits?
    Yes