Scolel 'te

Project/Juridiction proponent

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Cooperativa AMBIO S.C. de R.L.#http://ambio.org.mx/#MexicoNGO/private non for profit

Project/Juridiction Partners

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
UK Department for International Development (DFID)NDMexicoPublic
University of EdinburghNDMexicoResearch/academic institute
Bioclimatic Fund Trust (FBC)NDMexicoND
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas / National Commission for Protected Areas(CONANP)NDMexicoPublic
Comisión Nacional Forestal (National Forestry Commission)NDMexicoPublic
Edinburgh Centre of Carbon Management (ECCM, now a Camco company)NDMexicoND
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (Ecosur)NDMexicoPublic

Project characteristics

  • ID-RECCO ID
    102
  • Project status 2022
    Ongoing
  • Project name
    Scolel 'te
  • Secondary name
    Scolel té Natural Resources Management and Carbon Sequestration Project
  • Country
    Mexico
  • Last IDRECCO update year
    2020
  • Size (in hectare)
    9049
  • Start year
    1997
  • End year
    ND
  • Duration
    ND
  • Project description
    Scolel Té is a project that assists farmers and communities in southern Mexico to develop more sustainable land management and better livelihoods through the provision of carbon services.
  • Objective 1
    climate
  • Objective 2
    biodiversity conservation
  • Objective 3
    social development
  • Deforestation drivers
    fire, illegal logging, infrastructure, population increase, Transient agriculture
  • Type of forest
    humid
  • Project activity
    ARR|REDD
  • Project Type
    ARR
  • Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activity
    agroforestry, ecosystem restoration
  • Multiple locations?
    Yes
  • Jurisdiction level 1
    State : Chiapas and State : Oaxaca
  • Jurisdiction level 2
    Municipality : Tuxtla Gutiérrez

Carbon accounting

  • Crediting period
    2018-9999
  • Period to calculate annual carbon credits
  • Annual carbon credits
  • Total carbon credits
    13766.74
  • Leakage is expected?
    No
  • Carbon pools included
    Above ground biomass | Below ground biomass
  • Gasses included
    CO2
  • Reference period start year
    1997
  • Reference period end year
    2017
  • Carbon standard 1
    Plan vivo

Carbon certification

  • Carbon standard 1 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 1 Publication date
    35431
  • Carbon standard 1 Weblinks
    https://mer.markit.com/br-reg/public/project.jsp?project_id=100000000000170
  • Carbon standard 1 Expiry date
    44078
  • Carbon standard 2
    ECCM
  • Carbon standard 2 Progress
    can't confirm
  • Carbon standard 2 Publication date
    37298
  • Carbon standard 2 Weblinks
    http://planvivo.org/docs/2002_SGS_Verification_Report.pdf
  • Carbon standard 2 Expiry date
    44078
  • Carbon standard 3
    Rainforest Smartwood
  • Carbon standard 3 Progress
    can't confirm
  • Carbon standard 3 Publication date
    41298
  • Carbon standard 3 Weblinks
    http://planvivo.org/docs/Auditoria-Scolel-te-09-VP_borrador_.pdf/ http://planvivo.org/docs/Verification-Report_2013_Public.pdf
  • Carbon standard 3 Expiry date
    44078
  • Source of information
    https://mer.markit.com/br-reg/public/project.jsp?project_id=100000000000170

Community level intervention

  • Any monetary benefits?
    Yes
  • Monetary benefit type
    Conditional
  • Monetary benefit detail
    Producers (farmers) are accountable for their performance under their management plans and only receive payments when targets are met.Payment for the results of the actions taken by the participants, because of good management of the forests. These payments are made once the actions and the results of the actions have been monitored in the field.
  • Provides employment?
    Yes
  • Are there non-cash benefits?
    Yes
  • Economic activities - type
    agriculture | agroforestry | other
  • Is there tenure clarification?
    Yes
  • Is there environmental education?
    Yes
  • Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?
    No
  • Is there forest enhancement?
    Yes
  • Is there community infrastracture improvement?
    Yes
  • Is there other community benefits?
    Yes