INFAPRO Rehabilitation of logged-over dipterocarp forest in Sabah, Malaysia

Project/Juridiction proponent

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
Rakyat Berjaya#http://www.ysnet.org.my/rbj.asp?p=m&l=bi#Malaysiaprivate for-profit
Face the Futurewww.face-thefuture.com#http://www.face-thefuture.com#MalaysiaNGO/private non for profit

Project/Juridiction Partners

NameWebsiteLocation of headquartersOrganization type
FRIM(FRIM)NDMalaysiaND
Oxford Forestry InstituteNDMalaysiaPublic
University of AberdeenNDMalaysiaResearch/academic institute
University of LondonNDMalaysiaResearch/academic institute
University Putra Malaysia(UPM)NDMalaysiaResearch/academic institute
Wanariset Research Station (Samarinda, Indonesia)NDMalaysiaResearch/academic institute
ASEAN Canada Forest Tree Seed Centre (Thailand)NDMalaysiaND
FRC(FRC)NDMalaysiaND

Project characteristics

  • ID-RECCO ID
    558
  • Project status 2022
    TBC
  • Project name
    INFAPRO Rehabilitation of logged-over dipterocarp forest in Sabah, Malaysia
  • Secondary name
    Innoprise-Face Foundation Rainforest Rehabilitation Project
  • Country
    Malaysia
  • Last IDRECCO update year
    2020
  • Size (in hectare)
    25000
  • Start year
    ND
  • End year
    2091
  • Duration
    99
  • Project description
    The INFAPRO (Innoprise-Face Foundation Rainforest Rehabilitation Project) project rehabilitates 25,000 ha of severely logged-over forest, prevents relogging of the forest in this area and promotes sustainable management of timber and non-timber products. Plantations include indigenous dipterocarps, fast growing pioneers and forest fruit trees. Additional project activities include liberation, climber cutting and intensive management to enhance the growth of the residual forest matrix.
  • Objective 1
    climate
  • Objective 2
    biodiversity conservation
  • Objective 3
    timber production
  • Deforestation drivers
    industrial wood exploitation
  • Type of forest
    humid
  • Project activity
    IFM
  • Project Type
    IFM
  • Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activity
    NA
  • Multiple locations?
    No
  • Jurisdiction level 1
    State : Sabah
  • Jurisdiction level 2
    Division : Tawau

Carbon accounting

  • Crediting period
    2007-2036
  • Period to calculate annual carbon credits
  • Annual carbon credits
  • Total carbon credits
    4140409
  • Leakage is expected?
    ND
  • Carbon pools included
    ND
  • Gasses included
    ND
  • Reference period start year
    ND
  • Reference period end year
    ND
  • Carbon standard 1
    VCS

Carbon certification

  • Carbon standard 1 Progress
    certified
  • Carbon standard 1 Publication date
    40786
  • Carbon standard 1 Weblinks
    https://registry.verra.org/app/projectDetail/VCS/672
  • Carbon standard 1 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2
    none
  • Carbon standard 2 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 2 Expiry date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3
    none
  • Carbon standard 3 Progress
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Publication date
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Weblinks
    ND
  • Carbon standard 3 Expiry date
    ND
  • Source of information
    http://www.forestcarbonportal.com/project/infapro-forest-rehabilitation ; https://vcsprojectdatabase2.apx.com/myModule/Interactive.asp?Tab=Projects&a=2&i=672&lat=4%2E97330972787402&lon=117%2E900063946956&bp=1 ; http://theredddesk.org/countries/initiatives/infapro-rehabilitation-logged-over-dipterocarp-forest-sabah ; https://registry.verra.org/app/projectDetail/VCS/672

Community level intervention

  • Any monetary benefits?
    ND
  • Monetary benefit type
    ND
  • Monetary benefit detail
    ND
  • Provides employment?
    Yes
  • Are there non-cash benefits?
    No
  • Economic activities - type
    plantation forestry | tree planting
  • Is there tenure clarification?
    No
  • Is there environmental education?
    No
  • Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?
    Yes
  • Is there forest enhancement?
    No
  • Is there community infrastracture improvement?
    No
  • Is there other community benefits?
    No